Its been a BAD day...... much like my 29th birthday (when the Senate approved HR 3590 - aka Obamacare). Although I had prepared myself for this moment (during
many-a-conversations with Darin, Jana and Tiffany discussing my hunch that
Roberts would side with the left to uphold Obamacare), I was not prepared for
the full emotional turmoil of today.
I felt COMPLETE elation when CNN reported the Supreme Court had struck
down the individual mandate. CNN was wrong – for a good two minutes. Allowing
me to jump and scream and celebrate. Then, when the correct reading of the
court’s opinion was relayed, I felt defeated.
There is much to read and interpret from the decision,
specifically the distinction of the mandate as a tax. John Roberts is alone in
this interpretation – that the mandate does not hold under the Commerce Clause,
but is effectively a tax and therefore permissible under Congress’ taxing authority.
The conservative justices argue the mandate was not presented as a tax, is not
permissible under taxing authority or the Commerce Clause. The liberal justices differ from
Roberts in their belief that it is permissible under the Commerce Clause. In any case, Roberts’ interpretation
provides a political victory for Obama.
I respect that the Supreme Court ruled on constitutionality.
Justice Roberts, however, makes certain to emphasize that the court’s decision
does not rule on whether the law is sound policy. I do not believe it is. This ruling will most certainly rally the Republican base,
but it is yet to be determined what impact it will have on independents and
moderates (key to winning the election). Whether, as CNN contributor David Gergen
says, the court’s decision will likely sway independent voters to back away
from Obamacare repeal ‘time to give it a rest; let’s get our focus back on the
economy’ or whether independents will recognize that the health and sustainability
of our economy is inextricably linked to the repeal of Obamacare is yet to be
seen.
No comments:
Post a Comment